<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Domino People&#039;s News and Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog</link>
	<description>Lotus Notes and Domino News and Technotes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Traveler 9 Console Commands by Steven Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=420#comment-266999</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=420#comment-266999</guid>
		<description>Hi,

The Traveler server will perform a Domino Directory (previously Name and Address book) lookup for each user configured with the Traveler service. This will be performed normally via Directory Assistance on the Domino Directory on your primary production Domino Domain where your mail servers reside. (I hope your Traveler server is in a different Domino domain!!!)

So, you can either check the Mail Server field within the person document for a particular user. An alternative is from the Traveler server console, issue &lt;em&gt;tell traveler user &quot;user name&quot;&lt;/em&gt;. The resulting output will show you which devices the user has and which servers are being used by the Traveler server.

Please also bear in mind that if you have clustered mail servers and one or more of the servers are unavailable, the Traveler server will failover to an available mail server with a mail file replica available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>The Traveler server will perform a Domino Directory (previously Name and Address book) lookup for each user configured with the Traveler service. This will be performed normally via Directory Assistance on the Domino Directory on your primary production Domino Domain where your mail servers reside. (I hope your Traveler server is in a different Domino domain!!!)</p>
<p>So, you can either check the Mail Server field within the person document for a particular user. An alternative is from the Traveler server console, issue <em>tell traveler user &#8220;user name&#8221;</em>. The resulting output will show you which devices the user has and which servers are being used by the Traveler server.</p>
<p>Please also bear in mind that if you have clustered mail servers and one or more of the servers are unavailable, the Traveler server will failover to an available mail server with a mail file replica available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Traveler 9 Console Commands by Merrymax</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=420#comment-266998</link>
		<dc:creator>Merrymax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=420#comment-266998</guid>
		<description>Can you please tell me any command which show from which mail server , traveler server is currently connected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please tell me any command which show from which mail server , traveler server is currently connected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Orphaned Devices on Traveler HA SQL by Claude</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=592#comment-266268</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=592#comment-266268</guid>
		<description>I have this issue, with Traveler 9.0.1.15, and the syntax is now invalid:
Traveler: Command &#039;sql delete * from USERS where username=&#039;CN=John Doe/OU=People/O=organization&#039;&#039; failed with error com.lotus.sync.db.PersistenceException: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Incorrect syntax nea
r &#039;*&#039;. (SQLState: S0001 ErrorCode: 1
01/20/2017 04:57:20 PM  Traveler: 02)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this issue, with Traveler 9.0.1.15, and the syntax is now invalid:<br />
Traveler: Command &#8216;sql delete * from USERS where username=&#8217;CN=John Doe/OU=People/O=organization&#8221; failed with error com.lotus.sync.db.PersistenceException: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Incorrect syntax nea<br />
r &#8216;*&#8217;. (SQLState: S0001 ErrorCode: 1<br />
01/20/2017 04:57:20 PM  Traveler: 02)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Traveler 9 Console Commands by Nicki</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=420#comment-262912</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=420#comment-262912</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for posting this!  IBM still has not updated the Traveler documentation to include this command.  *shakes fist*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for posting this!  IBM still has not updated the Traveler documentation to include this command.  *shakes fist*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compact -b -S10    Does it work ? by Steven Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=28#comment-260901</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=28#comment-260901</guid>
		<description>Hey Syed,

If you are using Transaction logs for incremental backups then the -B switch changes the DBIID so you need to ensure a full backup is taken.

From the technote below, and I&#039;m assuming that a compact -B will be OK to use, I&#039;d go with the -A -B switches

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21084388

Thanks for posting and I hope this helps you out,
Steven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Syed,</p>
<p>If you are using Transaction logs for incremental backups then the -B switch changes the DBIID so you need to ensure a full backup is taken.</p>
<p>From the technote below, and I&#8217;m assuming that a compact -B will be OK to use, I&#8217;d go with the -A -B switches</p>
<p><a href="http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21084388" rel="nofollow">http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21084388</a></p>
<p>Thanks for posting and I hope this helps you out,<br />
Steven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compact -b -S10    Does it work ? by Syed Jahanzaib</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=28#comment-260900</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed Jahanzaib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 05:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=28#comment-260900</guid>
		<description>Sorry to wake very old thread. but i am unable to get any reply for this issue.
I have domino 8.5.3 FP6 with transactional logs enabled.
with -a , it only archive but does not reduce file size.
with -B, it does reduce file size.

So can I use &quot; load compact -a -B mail\ &quot; together? any negative impact of running it altogether?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to wake very old thread. but i am unable to get any reply for this issue.<br />
I have domino 8.5.3 FP6 with transactional logs enabled.<br />
with -a , it only archive but does not reduce file size.<br />
with -B, it does reduce file size.</p>
<p>So can I use &#8221; load compact -a -B mail\ &#8221; together? any negative impact of running it altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installing Domino Fix Packs on Windows 2008 R2 by Dave Harris</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=371#comment-242766</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=371#comment-242766</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chris, killing SNMP/VMware Tools worked for me in the end, wouldn&#039;t have thought to stop without your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chris, killing SNMP/VMware Tools worked for me in the end, wouldn&#8217;t have thought to stop without your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Domino Error &#8211; Unable to Bind port&#8230;.. by Kedrick</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=195#comment-104696</link>
		<dc:creator>Kedrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=195#comment-104696</guid>
		<description>Hello David,

Just disable &quot;World Wide Web Publishing service&quot; in services if you don&#039;t need it and run &quot;load http&quot; from Lotus Domino console.

Hope this help

Kedrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello David,</p>
<p>Just disable &#8220;World Wide Web Publishing service&#8221; in services if you don&#8217;t need it and run &#8220;load http&#8221; from Lotus Domino console.</p>
<p>Hope this help</p>
<p>Kedrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Useful view for Replication or Save conflicts by Peter Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=313#comment-101552</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 08:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=313#comment-101552</guid>
		<description>The reason is, that once you save a Conflicting document, you thereby accept it as no longer being in conflict !
Hence, you will find among the &#039;normal&#039; documents, but if you have a Key value for it (logical unique one, like SSN or CustomerID) you can use standard search to find you have two with the same key (if you haven&#039;t got the option to rename unique keys once Document is created, that is).
Hope it explains - take a look at the Notes User Help database, it explains how to resolve Replication Conflicts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason is, that once you save a Conflicting document, you thereby accept it as no longer being in conflict !<br />
Hence, you will find among the &#8216;normal&#8217; documents, but if you have a Key value for it (logical unique one, like SSN or CustomerID) you can use standard search to find you have two with the same key (if you haven&#8217;t got the option to rename unique keys once Document is created, that is).<br />
Hope it explains &#8211; take a look at the Notes User Help database, it explains how to resolve Replication Conflicts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Workaround for unread marks problem. by Iwan</title>
		<link>http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=305#comment-80611</link>
		<dc:creator>Iwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 18:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dominopeople.ie/blog/?p=305#comment-80611</guid>
		<description>This is very useful..
Thx Cormac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very useful..<br />
Thx Cormac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
